{"id":25741,"date":"2023-12-06T01:41:02","date_gmt":"2023-12-05T22:41:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lorenalupu.com\/blog\/?p=25741"},"modified":"2023-12-06T12:03:39","modified_gmt":"2023-12-06T09:03:39","slug":"napoleon-e-o-jena-de-film","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lorenalupu.com\/blog\/napoleon-e-o-jena-de-film\/","title":{"rendered":"Napoleon e o jen\u0103 de film"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\u00cencerc\u00e2nd s\u0103 se opun\u0103 corectitudinii politice care, \u00een ultima vreme, domin\u0103 cinematografia interna\u021bional\u0103, Ridley Scott, acest mo\u0219ulic\u0103 nostalgic al vremurilor c\u00e2nd b\u0103rbatul d\u0103dea cu pumnul \u00een mas\u0103, \u0219i-a pus la b\u0103taie propria companie de produc\u021bie Scott Free Productions – adic\u0103, Scott \u0103la liber, cel care nu \u021bine cont de cenzura progresist\u0103, wink – s\u0103 fac\u0103 un film despre ceea ce el considera a fi un mascul alfa al istoriei, Napoleon Bonaparte. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0218i a f\u0103cut un film care, \u00een aparen\u021b\u0103, p\u0103stra re\u021beta de succes a Hollywood-ului de alt\u0103dat\u0103. Un A-lister american, Joaquin Phoenix, \u00een rolul titular. Multe scene de gore explicit, cu capete t\u0103iate pe ecran, s\u00e2nge s\u0103rind, moarte \u00een direct, cum nu prea se \u00eent\u00e2mpl\u0103 \u00een ultima vreme. \u0218i femei \u00eempinse la marginea ecranului, tratate ca ni\u0219te obiecte s**xuale, pentru c\u0103 nu-i a\u0219a, b\u0103rba\u021bii alfa nu au sentimente. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Problema e c\u0103 filmele de succes ale Hollywood-ului de alt\u0103dat\u0103 func\u021bionau at\u00e2t de bine \u0219i erau at\u00e2t de captivante \u00een primul r\u00e2nd pentru c\u0103 erau doldora nu doar de sentimente, ci \u0219i de semnifica\u021bie, \u0219i de mesaj. De o umanitate profund\u0103 care r\u0103zb\u0103tea prin poveste \u0219i \u00ee\u021bi aducea o concluzie revelatoare, spun\u00e2ndu-\u021bi de ce respectiva figur\u0103 istoric\u0103 a fost mare om, mare caracter. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eternul \u201ece voia autorul s\u0103 spun\u0103 cu chestia asta?\u201d. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Napoleon al lui Ridley Scott e un mascul alfa, a\u0219a cum e el definit de incelii de pe Redditul anilor 2020. Rece, taciturn, \u00eenc\u0103p\u0103\u021b\u00e2nat, lipsit de carism\u0103, lipsit de empatie, lipsit de nuan\u021b\u0103, obsedat de glorie \u0219i de putere, disperat s\u0103 aib\u0103 ultimul cuv\u00e2nt. A\u0219a \u00eencepe \u0219i a\u0219a se termin\u0103. Rezultatul e c\u0103, pe la primele 40 de minute dup\u0103 \u00eenceputul filmului, te cuprinde un somn de-\u021bi dizloci f\u0103lcile c\u0103sc\u00e2nd, \u0219i drama e c\u0103 mai ai o or\u0103 \u0219i 40 de minute de \u00eendurat. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Acum, s\u0103 ne \u00een\u021belegem. Eu nu m\u0103 a\u0219tept ca un film s\u0103 respecte cu acurate\u021be istoria, a\u0219a cum o face un documentar. Un film poate apela la c\u00e2te licen\u021be poetice vrea autorul, \u00een slujba unui concept creativ care, \u00een mod ideal, e motorul care anim\u0103 povestea. Ceva ce l-a m\u00e2nat din primul moment \u0219i p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een cel \u00een care, la final, \u00eenchide ochii. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conceptul creativ al lui Ridley Scott, \u00eens\u0103, pare a fi \u201eNapoleon era mare \u0219i tare\u201d. \u0218i ce anume l-a m\u00e2nat? Ei, bine, presupunerea voastr\u0103, a celor care n-a\u021bi v\u0103zut filmul, e la fel de bun\u0103 ca a mea. Sentimentul c\u0103 era buricul p\u0103m\u00e2ntului \u0219i voia s\u0103 nu uite nimeni chestia asta? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00centr-o poveste bine construit\u0103 cu introducere, intrig\u0103, punct culminant, deznod\u0103m\u00e2nt, descoperi traseul eroului p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een punctul \u00een care ajunge mare \u0219i tare, \u0219i \u00een\u021belegi ce anume \u00eel face mare \u0219i tare. \u00cen acest caz, e doar figura de lemn a personajului, tonalitatea lui care spune \u201eSunt mai presus de semenii mei\u201d \u0219i extrem de pu\u021bine fapte concrete care s\u0103-i demonstreze m\u0103re\u021bia. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0218i drama e c\u0103 actorul folosit pentru aceast\u0103 misiune ingrat\u0103 e Joaquin Phoenix. Un actor c\u0103ruia \u00eei vine natural s\u0103 se conecteze la poveste (c\u00e2nd exist\u0103) \u0219i s\u0103 transmit\u0103 g\u00e2nd \u0219i emo\u021bie, dincolo de cuvinte. S\u0103 pui un astfel de actor s\u0103 \u00eembr\u0103\u021bi\u0219eze fixismul \u0103la gol de nuan\u021b\u0103 e un chin vizibil pentru Phoenix, care plute\u0219te \u00eentr-un disconfort teribil. Singurele momente \u00een care \u00eel recuno\u0219ti sunt scenele cu Josephine din a doua jum\u0103tate a filmului, c\u00e2nd regret\u0103 c\u0103 a pierdut-o. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dar nici m\u0103car nu \u021bi-e prea clar ce anume regret\u0103. Pentru c\u0103 modul \u00een care Scott o \u00eenf\u0103\u021bi\u0219eaz\u0103 pe Josephine e ca pe o femeie u\u0219oar\u0103 pe care Nap o aga\u021b\u0103 la Balul Supravie\u021buitorilor (nobili care au sc\u0103pat neghilotina\u021bi) \u0219i care vine s\u0103-l \u00eentrebe cu tupeu de ce se holbeaz\u0103 la ea. Povestea de amor e lipsit\u0103 de substan\u021b\u0103 \u0219i de emo\u021bie, \u0219i \u00een scurt timp afl\u0103m c\u0103 Nap e \u00een Egipt unde face un r\u0103zboi – nu afl\u0103m cum a ajuns acolo \u0219i de ce – iar ea deja \u00eel \u00een\u0219al\u0103 cu unul t\u00e2n\u0103r \u0219i frumos. Uhm, stai, ce? Unde e povestea aia intens\u0103 de iubire care s\u0103-l fac\u0103 pe Nap s\u0103 fug\u0103 la ea dup\u0103 ce a p\u0103r\u0103sit-o, dup\u0103 ce are un fiu de la a doua so\u021bie, cu bebelu\u0219ul \u00een bra\u021be, s\u0103-i arate c\u0103 uite, drag\u0103, \u0103sta ar fi putut fi copilul t\u0103u. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Stai, ce? Ce mam\u0103 ar fi permis ca boul din dotare s\u0103-i ia bebelu\u0219ul nou n\u0103scut \u0219i s\u0103 plece cu el peste mun\u021bi \u0219i v\u0103i la c**va cu care se co\u021b\u0103ia el \u00eenainte \u0219i s\u0103 aib\u0103 o scen\u0103 lacrimogen\u0103 de tip \u201ede ce nu e al nostru\u201d? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Iar c\u00e2nd spun c\u0103 se co\u021b\u0103ia, nu exagerez. Scene mai lipsite de emo\u021bie, mai d\u00e2nsa-ntr-\u00eensa iepure\u0219te cu finalizare din trei penetr\u0103ri, \u00een timp ce ea se uit\u0103 cu privirea goal\u0103 \u00een zare, n-am v\u0103zut nici pe sec\u021biunea repede \u0219i iute de pe P***hub. \u0102sta e actul de iubire cu femeia pentru care fugi din exil? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00cen afar\u0103 de Napoleon \u0219i de Josephine, filmul e populat cu oameni \u00een costume de epoc\u0103 despre care nu \u00een\u021belegi cine sunt – dec\u00e2t c\u00e2nd li se spune numele, dar \u0219i atunci se presupune c\u0103 vei da un goag\u0103l s\u0103 afli detalii, pentru c\u0103 filmul nu te ajut\u0103 cu nimic – ce rol joac\u0103 \u00een nara\u021biune, cu ce \u00eel ajut\u0103 sau \u00eencurc\u0103 pe erou, care e misiunea lor \u0219i ce \u00eei define\u0219te ca oameni. Dac\u0103 genericul ar fi fost cinstit, i-ar fi inclus pe to\u021bi \u00een categoria \u201efigura\u021bie special\u0103\u201d. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0218i un am\u0103nunt mi s-a p\u0103rut absolut cringe. Napoleon se ceart\u0103 cu Josephine pe tema: unul dintre noi e infertil, sigur e\u0219ti tu. \u0218i vine m\u0103-sa cu ideea: ia s\u0103 lu\u0103m o feti\u021b\u0103 de 18 ani \u0219i s-o **\u021bi, s\u0103 o la\u0219i gravid\u0103, a\u0219a demonstr\u0103m c\u0103 nu la tine e problema. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Alo! E o fat\u0103 de 18 ani. Un om. O fiin\u021b\u0103 vie. \u00cei turn\u0103m un plod f\u0103r\u0103 s\u0103 ne intereseze soarta ei, doar pentru c\u0103 masculinitatea cuiva are nevoie de validare? Really? Apoi, afl\u0103m c\u0103 a r\u0103mas \u00eentr-adev\u0103r gravid\u0103. Apoi, filmul nu mai men\u021bioneaz\u0103 nimic, nici de ea, nici de copil. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ceva mai cringe nu am v\u0103zut \u00een via\u021ba mea. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Insist: nu am nevoie s\u0103-mi spui povestea aia \u00eentr-un mod care s\u0103 respecte istoria, dac\u0103 nu vrei. Dar am nevoie s\u0103-mi spui o poveste. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

O poveste a unui om care porne\u0219te de undeva \u0219i ajunge altundeva, \u0219i a tuturor modurilor \u00een care \u00eel transform\u0103 via\u021ba de la punctul A \u0219i p\u00e2n\u0103 \u00een punctul B, pentru a-mi oferi imaginea unei fiin\u021be umane puternice \u00een vulnerabilitatea ei. Dac\u0103 nu v\u0103d aceast\u0103 evolu\u021bie, prefer s\u0103 mut canalul pe desene animate. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Napoleon al lui Ridley Scott e at\u00e2t de robotic, \u00eenc\u00e2t \u00eel face pe Terminator s\u0103 par\u0103 eroul unui film de Cr\u0103ciun de pe Hallmark, \u0219i at\u00e2t de cli\u0219eic, \u00eenc\u00e2t face filmele lui Sergiu Nicolaescu s\u0103 par\u0103 drame psihologice pline de nuan\u021b\u0103 \u0219i detaliu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

***<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dac\u0103 apreciezi aceast\u0103 rubric\u0103, po\u021bi sus\u021bine la r\u00e2ndul t\u0103u site-ul \u00een singurul mod care conteaz\u0103. Aici<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

***<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

***<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Vrei s\u0103 m\u0103 urm\u0103re\u015fti \u00een social media? \u00cemi po\u0163i da like pe Facebook<\/strong><\/a>, follow pe Twitter<\/a><\/strong> \u015fi Instagram<\/a><\/strong>, subscribe pe YouTube<\/a><\/strong> \u015fi pe TikTok<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00cencerc\u00e2nd s\u0103 se opun\u0103 corectitudinii politice care, \u00een ultima vreme, domin\u0103 cinematografia interna\u021bional\u0103, Ridley Scott, acest mo\u0219ulic\u0103 nostalgic al vremurilor c\u00e2nd b\u0103rbatul d\u0103dea cu...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":25742,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25741","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-spicy"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/lorenalupu.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Phoenix_as_Napoleon.jpg?fit=1440%2C907&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lorenalupu.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25741","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lorenalupu.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lorenalupu.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lorenalupu.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lorenalupu.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25741"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/lorenalupu.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25741\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25751,"href":"https:\/\/lorenalupu.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25741\/revisions\/25751"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lorenalupu.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/25742"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lorenalupu.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25741"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lorenalupu.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25741"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lorenalupu.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25741"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}